data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ea42/5ea420913a3530b613434304b5251ae49443f359" alt=""
I have to confess experimental writing does not appeal. Stream of consciousness and Burroughsian cut-ups leave me cold; I love narrative structures (but not necessarily conventional ones), also strongly descriptive and visual writing; concrete worlds to get lost in, challenging in content rather then stylistics. This is probably why I've never attempted Iain Sinclair's novels or poems, but his non-fiction although not straight forward (as in Peter Ackroyd's historical accounts), gives access to a hidden London.
You can't help but admire Sinclair's writing talent. It's deliberately obscure a lot of the time and the scattering of little known names throughout without explanation can be irritating. But the dazzling prose carries you on through many interesting diversions: Graffiti as the city's unconscious language; Surveillance systems (CCTV, etc) being the city's own film of itself; occult conspiracies' of the Establishment; the anarchist and provocateur, Stewart Home; the relationship of the pit-ball to Hackney and environs; The Kray Twins in the East End; Jeffrey Archer in his penthouse overlooking the Thames; the visionary significance of Kings Cross; the park in Charlton where Antonioni filmed Blow-Up-and so on.
Strictly for Londoners, 'reforgotten poets' or those who love the art of a great prose stylist.
No comments:
Post a Comment